The
recent surveys conducted for the 2016 presidential elections brings
to mind the polls taken by the same research groups for the 1998
vote. The main protagonists in 1998 were then Vice
President Joseph “Erap” Ejercito Estrada and Senator Gloria
Macapagal Arroyo, while for 2016 are incumbent Vice President Jejomar
Binay and Senator Grace Poe. Same positions then and now – vice
president and senator.
In the
surveys for the 1998 vote, Erap led GMA most of the time by just the
slimmest of margins, as this table would show:
Period
|
Erap
|
GMA
|
September 1996 |
19%
|
14%
|
December 1996 |
17%
|
17%
|
April 1997 |
23%
|
22%
|
September 1997 |
19%
|
19%
|
January 1998 |
18%
|
15%
|
Noteworthy
was the fact that the would be standard-bearer of the then ruling
political party languished near the cellar with the following survey
results: September 1996 – 1%; December 1996 – 2%; April 1997 –
5%; September 1997 – 3%; and, January 1998 – 6%.
GMA
was eventually chosen as the running-mate of Lakas-NUCD
standard-bearer Jose De Venecia, Jr., and led the vice presidential
race from start to finish.
For
the 1998 presidential campaign, the surveys showed the following:
Period
|
Erap
|
JDV
|
March 1998 |
28%
|
14%
|
April 1998 |
30%
|
12%
|
May 1998 |
33%
|
15%
|
Erap
won the May 1998 presidential elections, and an analysis of the
surveys and official results would indicate that those who
selected GMA in the early surveys were split between Erap and JDV
when the then Senator chose to slide down to the vice presidency.
Going
back to the present surveys, here are the initial results for the
incumbent vice president and senator:
Period
|
Binay
|
Poe
|
June-July 2014 |
41%
|
12%
|
September 2014 |
31%
|
10%
|
November 2014 |
26%
|
18%
|
Significantly,
the leading presidential candidate of the ruling Liberal Party, just
like the standard-bearer of the ruling Lakas-NUCD in 1998, also
suffers with the following survey results: June- July 2014 – 7%;
September 2014 – 13%; and November 2014 – 6%.
Is this a trend? Will the 2016 results be the same as 1998? Or is it too
early to say?
No comments:
Post a Comment